I post this blog, "Thoughts on Art and Teaching," for me to go back to, to read and reflect upon. You are welcome to join me. I don't want to forget these conversations in my retirement.
Mr. Hamlyn's last post loosely discusses the disconnect between the theoretical approach to teaching art as taught in University, and the teaching of art according to the standards in our public schools (and my experience that private and charter schools are worse). I heard this same disconnect when attending grad school, but also discovered that an art teacher has so much personal influence in the way he or she approaches the teaching of art. University clarified for me something I'd discovered in my final years of teaching- that classroom teaching can become less explicit in terms of elements and principles, and more holistic in terms of interpretation and social justice. Foundational skills in art are relatively simple to teach and learn in the context of teaching those hermeneutic skills of interpretation and meaning, dontcha think? (I'd heard an art academy instructor once suggest that the meaning and appreciation of art is essential to learn before college, particularly in those elementary classes and that "one" required art class most students take before h.s. graduation; that continuing art students will study value et.al with the necessary depth they need at the university level. The mastering of value or texture is NOT important to students who are not to become artists. Interesting concept here.)
With attention and compassion, I believe art education can be all we, as good educators, can make it. Mandatory testing, Explicit Direct Instruction, and schools designated as failing- the labels and demands made by the state of education in the nation today- haven't quite wheedled their ways through the closed doors of art classrooms yet; the art room may be the last vestige of teaching thinking. Good art educators need to grasp the power they have, albeit with sly and sneak, with every last inkling of hope that the state of education will turn around soon.
“Thick”! “Thick”? – that’s ok, I know what you mean but in the UK, saying someone is thick has somewhat of a different ring to it perhaps.
ReplyDeleteGreat to find your blog too. I can already see that’s there’s lots here to spend more time with.
Best
Jim